Template:Did you know nominations/French submarine Armide

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

French submarine Armide

(

)

Armide, date unknown

... that when the sale of the French-built No14 (pictured) was cancelled by France during World War I, the Japanese Navy built another No14 by itself? Source: http://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_ss_schneider_laubeuf.htm
- ALT1:... that when the submarine No14 (pictured), ordered by Japan, was seized by France before its sale, the Japanese Navy built its own No14 by itself? Source: http://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_ss_schneider_laubeuf.htm
- ALT2:... that when the Japanese submarine No14 (pictured) was seized by France and commissioned into its navy as Armide, the Japanese Navy built its own No14 by itself? Source: http://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_ss_schneider_laubeuf.htm
- ALT3:... that after the French-built Japanese submarine No14 (pictured) had been seized by France and commissioned into its navy as Armide, the Japanese built their own No14 to the same design?

Reviewed: Woodvale Park
Comment: feel free to remove "by itself" if you think it does not fit in well.

Created by L293D (talk). Self-nominated at 14:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC).

@L293D: This article is new enough and long enough, and I have added user Lyndaship to the credits. The image is in the public domain, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. I can't see the hook fact, about the Japanese replacing the requisitioned vessel, in the article so I think we need a different hook. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Fixed, I've added the hook fact to the article. L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

@L293D: Thank you. I have added a citation for the fact. What do you think of ALT3? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

ALT3 is really nice, I've struck my other hooks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Although I suggested ALT3, it is really just a rehash of the other hooks so I'll give it a tick. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:17, 23 November 2018 (UTC)