- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 17:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fritz Stein
edit... that Fritz Stein found in 1909 in an archive orchestral parts of the Jena Symphony, which he published as possibly an early work by Beethoven?
- Reviewed: Sahwat al-Khudr
- Comment: mention that it was payed as by Beethoven until 1957, or better not, to raise curiosity?
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 16:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. The source, however, does not mention the year that he discovered the symphony, only that he published it in 1911. If you remove the date from the hook (and the article), it will make it snappier. Yoninah (talk) 20:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- You are right:
- ALT1: ... that Fritz Stein found in an archive orchestral parts of the Jena Symphony, which he published as possibly an early work by Beethoven?
- What do we do about the article? The source says 1910, but our article on the symphony (all sources offline) has 1909? Same in the German WP from where I translated. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: do you have to say anything? You could just say that while he was in Jena, he discovered the symphony, which he published in 1911. Yoninah (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- taken with thanks, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
