The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
... that Gea eff has the shortest scientific name of any spider species? Source: "Shortest scientific name—Gea eff Levi (Araneidae). This spider has only six characters in its name." doi:10.7717/peerj.3972: 11
ALT1: ... that a Capuchin friar was the first person to realize Gea eff was a new species of spider? Source: "The spiders from this region were identified by Fr. Chrysanthus. At least five species of Argiope occur in the Wau valley and its environs. These are A , aemula, A. picta, A. reinwardti, A . trifmciata and species “F”. The latter was judged by Fr. Chrysanthus to be a new species and, at the time of his death, was set aside for further study" doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1974.tb00796.x.: 146 and "We wish to acknowledge our deep debt of gratitude to Fr. Chrysanthus O.F.M" ibid.: 158 . [1] is more explicit about calling him of the Capuchin Order using "O.F.M. Cap." and also saying he lived at a monastery of the Capuchin Order
Comment: The image in the article is CC0 1.0 so could be used for the main page, but I'm not sure if the image is good enough quality for that. Including the image with the submission in case the reviewer thinks the hooks would be better with a (pictured) and image. Also I'm not sure if ALT0 need a wikilink to List of short species names or not, but figured I'd submit it with a link; reviewer can choose to remove it.
Created by Umimmak (talk). Self-nominated at 06:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC).
Overall: Article is new enough, long enough, well cited and neutral. QPQ done. I can't see plagiarism. The image is OK I think, but happy to leave its inclusion to promoter. I think ALT0 is the better DYK, and I like the inclusion of the second hyperlink. Cool article. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg)
Article is new enough, long enough, well cited and neutral. QPQ done. I can't see plagiarism. The image is OK I think, but happy to leave its inclusion to promoter. I think ALT0 is the better DYK, and I like the inclusion of the second hyperlink. Cool article. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)