Template:Did you know nominations/Gellner's theory of nationalism

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 22:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Gellner's theory of nationalism

edit

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 09:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Comment. Should that read "is one of the principal explanations of the said phenomenon?" In which case, it might as well read "is one of the principal explanations of nationalism?". However, this seems self-evident, and thus is not much of a hook. Edwardx (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
  • New enough, long enough, neutrally written (and well written), well referenced. As all sources are offline, unable to check for close paraphrasing. A number of citations have a "page number needed" template, which will not hold up the DYK nomination, but should be filled in. In the first hook, "said phenomenon" (without the "the") is grammatically correct, but I agree that Cwmhiraeth's ALT is much better, so if it's all the same to you, let's go with that. Although it's not usually done, I linked nationalism in the quote to give it some context for readers. Offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:56, 4 May 2015 (UTC)