Template:Did you know nominations/Gisèle Rabesahala

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Gisèle Rabesahala

edit

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 23:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC).


  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 22:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 4778 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (2.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:26, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

  • I've double checked the robot review. I couldn't check the information in the hook fact against the source given (it was not viewable online), but it checks out against other sources and I have no reason to believe it is in error. I also couldn't check against that source for possible copyvios. However, the robot's "low confidence" possible copyright infringement is completely bogus and unrelated (someone else died on the same day.) Length, date of creation, etc. are all fine. There are very few sources cited, but as far as I know there is no hard requirement for a minimum number of sources for DYK, as long as those given are reasonably sound. If someone else has access to the main citation, they could review it for issues, or I believe this could be a DYK AGF (accepted in good faith). Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 04:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
  • @Prioryman: could you confirm that the facts about her being the first Malagasy woman to be elected as a municipal councillor and the first woman to lead a Malagasy political party both appear in the Sylvia source (offline)? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:59, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
  • There's also a UNESCO report that could added as a reference to support this: "She was the first woman to be elected as a municipal councillor (1956) and political party leader (1958). She was also the first woman appointed minister in 1977." Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm happy to change the source to an online one if that helps with verifiability. I'd suggest using this as it's the same text but not in a PDF. It's used in the article. Prioryman (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
  • It's fine to cite multiple sources, so I would add both of those. Then we can look at checking off.
  • Added these citations to the article and the hook. Dorevabelfiore (talk) 23:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)