Template:Did you know nominations/Great Mongol Shahnameh
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Great Mongol Shahnameh
edit
Bahram Gur killing a wolf
- ... that pages of the Great Mongol Shahnameh, a Persian manuscript of the 1330s, were pulled apart to increase their value?
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 02:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 834 chars to 7687 chars since 01:47, 25 May 2016 (UTC), a 9.22-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 7687 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 28.1% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The media File:Demotte Shahname 002.jpg is free-use
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 115 characters
- ✓ Johnbod has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/My Life in Court was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 03:23, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
-
Article expanded more than 5x. Images are PD but needed some licensing-tag work, which I've done. Hook is interesting and under 200 characters -- citation is in order. No close paraphrasing issues. QPQ satisfied. One recommendation: Instead of saying the manuscript was "pulled apart", which is sort of a fuzzy term than can easily imply that the manuscript was torn or otherwise damaged, you might want to say 'divided into parts'. Your call. Article is good to go. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
