Template:Did you know nominations/Greenside Mine

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Greenside Mine

edit

Greenside's collapsed holes

  • ALT1:...have a go
  • Reviewed: QPQ is not required
  • Comment: This is one day out of date, but I suggest that we should not lose this article

Created/expanded by Silence-is-infinite (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 20:33, 1 October 2014 (UTC).

  • This substantial article is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral. The hook is sourced offline and nearly all the references are offline so I made no assessment as to whether there are any copyright issues. The image is in the public domain but the hook is rather uninteresting and the image is very peripheral to the subject of the article. It is difficult to find a good hook, but how about this, for which a different picture would be required:

ALT1 ... that large holes on the side of a Cumbrian mountain (pictured) show where 18th-century mine workings in Greenside Mine have collapsed? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Cool - I've changed the image, can someone tick the new hook? Victuallers (talk) 15:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
  • The image isn't great in small format, but the ALT is very good. Offline hook ref AGF and cited inline. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)