Template:Did you know nominations/Gunung Mas Regency
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Flibirigit (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Gunung Mas Regency
- ... that due to its colonial origin, there have been calls to change the name of Gunung Mas Regency? Source: https://independensi.com/2018/03/06/nama-kabupaten-gunung-mas-merupakan-pelecehan-terhadap-identitas-dayak/
Created by Nyanardsan (talk). Self-nominated at 04:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC).
- I'll review this shortly, when I have read and assessed it. Storye book (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Update: Oh dear. This has to be an expansion nomination, as I see no indication that it has been offered for a GA assessment, and it was created in 2011. Nyanardsan when you started the expansion, the article had 1316 characters. It now has 6194 readable characters, according to DYK Check. To have been increased 5 times, it would now have to be 6580 characters. We can wait until you enlarge the text suffidiently, if you like? (I cannot review it now, as the article may change when you enlarge it). Storye book (talk) 16:34, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Expansion started on 26 December. This is nearly two weeks ago but expansions are supposed to be done within seven days to meet DYK rules. You need to make this expansion your first priority or else this nomination will fail. Schwede66 17:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- If thats the case, then please fail the nomination. I want to comply with the rules and I kinda lost interest in the article so have not much to add. Apologize for the insufficient expansion, that must be reduced due to copyedit because I remember previously it was eligible according to DYK Check. Thanks for reviewing it Nyanardsan (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
