Template:Did you know nominations/Gutta Percha Company
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:47, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Gutta Percha Company
edit- ... that the Gutta Percha Company, whose main product was submarine telegraph cable, started out making bottle stoppers? Source: Haigh, p. 26 for bottle stoppers, and p. 27 cable becoming main product
- Reviewed: Neo-Bechstein
Created by Spinningspark (talk). Self-nominated at 14:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC).
- Hi Spinningspark, review follows: article created 19 January; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no close paraphrasing noticed from the two sources I have access to; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, cited to offline sources so AGF on those; I added a couple of commas to the hook to "whose main product was submarine telegraph cable"), I think this is a relative clause - please revert if I am wrong; QPQ carried out. Looks good to me. I have to say I am enjoying your recent articles on this topic; a (very) long time ago I dabbled in this area writing CS Faraday (1874) and Alexander Siemens - Dumelow (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the kind words. Honestly, there are hundreds of articles that could be written in this area, especially on the ships, but companies and cables as well. Even the articles we already have could stand major expansion, some are very thin. But for now, I have one more article to come (the Magnetic Telegraph Company) and then I'm taking the books back to the library. SpinningSpark 10:40, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Spinningspark, review follows: article created 19 January; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no close paraphrasing noticed from the two sources I have access to; hook is interesting and mentioned in the article, cited to offline sources so AGF on those; I added a couple of commas to the hook to "whose main product was submarine telegraph cable"), I think this is a relative clause - please revert if I am wrong; QPQ carried out. Looks good to me. I have to say I am enjoying your recent articles on this topic; a (very) long time ago I dabbled in this area writing CS Faraday (1874) and Alexander Siemens - Dumelow (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)