- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allecher (talk) 01:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Guy Fulton
edit- ... that Guy Fulton designed 34 campus buildings and 16 fraternity/sorority houses at the University of Florida plus the spring-fed pool at Glen Springs?
- Reviewed: Never Ever Do This At Home
Created by Mgreason (talk). Self nominated at 02:11, 8 May 2013 (UTC).
The article lists the buildings at the UF campus designed by Fulton but does not specifically make a statement that supports the hook. I would have to tot up the buildings listed to know whether the number was correct. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- And that's a problem because...? Mgrē@sŏn 18:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- Its a problem because it is a DYK requirement that the hook fact is mentioned in the article and has an inline citation. Neither of these requirements is met here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- Look above the list: there's an inline citation for the statement that Fulton designed all of them. It would be patently absurd to require a citation after each of them; placing a citation after the lead to a list in order to be a source for the entire list is common and accepted practise here. "Routine calculations do not count as original research", so as we have a source saying that he designed all of them, and as the list has 16 buildings marked as fraternities or sororities and 34 other buildings, we have no problems. Nyttend (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Its a problem because it is a DYK requirement that the hook fact is mentioned in the article and has an inline citation. Neither of these requirements is met here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
OK. I guess I was being over zealous on this one. Tthe article passes the other DYK criteria of length and newness. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
