Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Zubian

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:17, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

HMS Zubian

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Parsecboy (talk). Nominated by Wilhelmina Will (talk) at 04:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC).

  • Recent GA, adequately referenced with inline citations, mostly to offline sources (books, periodicals). Date and size ok. Checking for close paraphrasing to the one online source given did not reveal any problems. QPQ not needed (a qpq review is indeed given, and I have not evaluated that one). Hook is interesting; however the hook fact differs slightly from what the article says (with AGF'ed inline citation to offline periodical). The hook and article ought to be more in harmony (article says the "choice of name" caused confusion, while I read the hook as sayings that the construction itself (the "combining of the warships") confused). Current hook length is close to maximum allowable length (202 characters including the starting "... "). Oceanh (talk) 20:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
I've condensed the hook and reworded it to "harmonize" better - it should be alright now. Spring in Wikipedia is lovely! Just avoid the articles on flowers... (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the response. Hook facts are now found in the article, and cited with inline citations. AGF for offline sources. Hook length for revised hook is fine. Oceanh (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)