Template:Did you know nominations/Hemlock Hoax, the Detective
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 11:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Hemlock Hoax, the Detective
edit- ... that the lead character of the film Hemlock Hoax, the Detective had been a minor character in a rejected story?
Created by Taylor Trescott (talk). Self nominated at 19:11, 24 June 2014 (UTC).
- More than meets character count, neutral, new enough, cited inline. The hook is less than 200 characters, neutral and is cited where the fact occurs in the article. The hook is also rather interesting. After checking through the sources, I found no copy vio issues. The only issue I found was that your 11th link doesn’t’ actually lead to an active website. Fix it and this article is good to go.Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- If you mean ref #11, it's not supposed to. It's a newspaper scan and there's no official site for 1910 news. I think if you Google the quoted phrase you can find some unofficial reproductions - here's one. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Ok, that's a fair explanation for source 11. Everything is good to go (AGF on the specific inline source as it is a printed, not an online, source). Spirit of Eagle (talk) 23:45, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- If you mean ref #11, it's not supposed to. It's a newspaper scan and there's no official site for 1910 news. I think if you Google the quoted phrase you can find some unofficial reproductions - here's one. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
