Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Gerber House

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 07:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Henry Gerber House

edit
(
)
Gerber House (center)
Gerber House (center)

5x expanded by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC).

  • The article is fully referenced, neutral and with no close paraphrasing. Hook is interesting & verified through online sources. QPQ done. Good to go to me! FrogmanOfTheSahara (talk) 05:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  • This review is in doubt. It part of a series of 15 (as of this posting) reviews done within minutes of each other several days in September. Please see WT:DYK. — Maile (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - Re hook & alt 1: The article lead says "the second such designation recognizing a site important in American LGBT history after the Stonewall Inn in New York City's Greenwich Village". The ref cited does not seem to support that. The only mention of the Stonewall Inn in ref 1 mentions National Historic Landmark status, but does not mention that Henry Gerber House is the second LGBT history designation. The ref seems to contradict the article when it says: "For example, some properties already designated National Historic Landmarks for other reasons have a connection with LGBTQ history, such as Philip Johnson’s Glass House or the home of Frances Willard, longtime director of the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union". 109.79.174.71 (talk) 22:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
I have removed that last clause, as upon further reflection, you're correct (I believe the unspoken distinction was that, while those sites have connections to gay history that was not the primary reason for nominating and recognizing them; however, in the case of Stonewall, it was. But it's not stated explicitly). Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
New review needed Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Review
  • QPQ by Daniel Case
Eligibility
  • Article created by Kranar drogin on June 27, 2007 and was 499 characters (0 words) "readable prose size" of readable prose when expansion began
  • Expansion began on August 28, 2015 and was 14620 characters (0 words) "readable prose size" on date of nomiination
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph sourced inline, online
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
Hook
  • Striking first hook - cannot find the information in the article or source
  • Alt 1 - Striking, cannot find the information in the article or source
  • ALT 2 - Hook is 154 characters, NPOV, stated in the article and sourced at the end of the sentence
Image
  • Image used is in the article and freely licensed on Commons
Tools
  • Duplication Detector on all online sources found no copyvio or close paraphrasing.

Good to go with ALT2. Daniel Case, I don't know if it's because of edits you made in regards to the above comment, or if I'm just not seeing what I should, but I really couldn't find the original hook and ALT1 in either the article or source. But we can go with ALT2, no problem with that one. Sorry this nomination got hung up the way it did with the questionable first "review". — Maile (talk) 22:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Henry_Gerber_House&oldid=683276904"