- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 06:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Hilda Hilst
Improved to Good Article status by MaterialWorks (talk). Self-nominated at 21:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Hilda Hilst; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
- Cited:
 - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting:
|
Overall:
Hilst is one of my favorite writers. I got excited upon seeing the DYK nom; the article itself did not disappoint. Excellent work expanding and improving to GA, No copyright vios. AGF on Portuguese sources, but it's similar enough to my native Spanish that I could understand and confirm. A pleasure to read. Thank you so much! —
CurryTime7-24 (
talk) 05:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Hilst is one of my favorite writers. I got excited upon seeing the DYK nom; the article itself did not disappoint. Excellent work expanding and improving to GA, No copyright vios. AGF on Portuguese sources, but it's similar enough to my native Spanish that I could understand and confirm. A pleasure to read. Thank you so much! —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 05:51, 28 October 2023 (UTC)