Template:Did you know nominations/Hinckley Priory

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Hinckley Priory

edit

Created by Rushton2010 (talk). Self nominated at 00:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC).

  • Could use more sources and content but looks like a x5 expansion of prose.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
  • The article has been expanded from 295 to 3,925bytes: a 13.3X expansion. And has 2,101 characters of readable prose: all within the guidelines. Also you've used the incorrect tick. The AGF tick is used for "Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith". The hook is referenced with two online, English references. Best --Rushton2010 (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
If we all followed the rules by the book, we'd be a boring place wouldn't we..

Article is good to go :-]♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

  • With the long list properly formatted, the article has insufficient prose. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Expanded again. Many Thanks --Rushton2010 (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • It's long enough now, due to the addition of good new content. I'm using the AGF tick because I didn't re-do the entire review myself (I'm AGF-ing the earlier review). --Orlady (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)