Template:Did you know nominations/Homeward Bound (organization)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:13, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Homeward Bound (organization)
- ... that in 2019, the Homeward Bound leadership program organized the largest all-women expedition to Antarctica? Source: "Leadership program in Antarctica a life-changing experience, says Laurentian University professor" (CBC.ca) and "Gold Fields geochemist on Antarctic expedition" (The West Australian)
Created by Aranya (talk). Self-nominated at 18:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC).
- The article was made today, so it's new enough. It currently sits at about 2400 characters, so it is long enough. The article reads neutrally and has in-line citations for the hook, as noted above. I saw no copyvio issues after running through the tool. The hook is short enough and interesting enough, so no problems there. The only thing left I have to ask about, @Aranya:, is that the QPQ seems to have been done in April. Did you not use it for anything else back then? I'm not sure what the rules are, if there even are any, in regards to how recent the QPQ review has to be. SilverserenC 02:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review Silver seren. I'm sure I haven't used the QPQ before, though I can replace it with a newer one if I missed a rule. Aranya (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Since I don't know the rules in that regard myself, i'm just going to accept it, @Aranya:. Apologies for the delay. SilverserenC 22:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Silver seren: The consensus among DYK editors is that there is no time limit on QPQs. You can check that it has not been used elsewhere by clicking on "What links here" while viewing the template of the QPQ. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- The article was made today, so it's new enough. It currently sits at about 2400 characters, so it is long enough. The article reads neutrally and has in-line citations for the hook, as noted above. I saw no copyvio issues after running through the tool. The hook is short enough and interesting enough, so no problems there. The only thing left I have to ask about, @Aranya:, is that the QPQ seems to have been done in April. Did you not use it for anything else back then? I'm not sure what the rules are, if there even are any, in regards to how recent the QPQ review has to be. SilverserenC 02:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)