Template:Did you know nominations/Horses in the United States

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Horses in the United States

edit

Created by OccultZone (talk). Largely expanded by Montanabw (talk) Nominated at 16:40, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

  • The article does not qualify because most of its content was copied from other Wikipedia articles (diff). Per WP:WIADYK, "The content with which the article has been expanded must be new content, not text copied from other articles."
Additional checks included: every paragraph has inline citations, checks for copyvio reveals no problems. Of note is that this copyvio check shows an initial potential copyvio problem relative to the site, but the site appears very likely to have copied content from the Wikipedia article (as is noted in other content on the page). Content of the hook is backed in the article with inline citations to reliable sources. North America1000 04:29, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I was just the writer of that hook and a total of 115 words. I will be back here in a few hours. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 04:33, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
You will see that I put in the merge/copy tags at the talk page to indicate per WP policy that I took a fair bit of material from the evolution and mustang articles. The wordpress site is definitely a mirror from the Evolution of the horse page (and its a creationism site anyway, so total nonsense to be a source here!) I also actually reworked quite a bit of the material after adding it, so it's not a simple copy and paste. The prior version before my edits and the moving in of material from other articles was way under the 1500 word limit and the citation was to a not-ideal site (Livescience can be good, but can also be tabloid-y and publishes breaking news as much as established science). All that said, I didn't do the DYK nom, but as I was the one who moved in a bunch of material and reworked it, I'm happy to keep working on it. Montanabw(talk) 04:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • New prose presently exceeds the 1,500 character minimum. North America1000 06:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Per the result from QPQ Check, OccultZone (creator of this nomination page) needs to perform a QPQ review before this can proceed. This is all that remains to be done. North America1000 17:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Reviewed many,[1][2][3][4][5][6] and probably more from last 6 days. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 17:22, 19 May 2015 (UTC)