Template:Did you know nominations/How to Blow Up a Pipeline
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 10:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
How to Blow Up a Pipeline
- ... that nonviolence advocate Tim DeChristopher described How to Blow Up a Pipeline by Andreas Malm as "a humble and nuanced case" for sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure? Source: "advocates of nonviolence (such as myself)", "Malm offers a humble and nuanced case for how sabotaging fossil fuel infrastructure and machinery might be “synergetic and complementary” to a movement largely centered around nonviolent mass mobilization."
- ALT1:... that the book How to Blow Up a Pipeline by Andreas Malm does not actually include instructions for blowing up a pipeline? Source: NYT Book Review, "I should add that there aren’t any actual instructions here about how to blow anything up"
- Reviewed: John Thomas Douglass
Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 19:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC).
- Article is:
New enough- Long enough
Within policy (the "six-point analysis" sentence in reaction to DeChristopher's review is not attributed. I'd prefer it was.) Neutrality and citations are fine.
- Hook is (ALT1 is the most interesting):
- Short enough
- Interesting, accurate, neutral
- QPQ is done.
Overall: 
should be GTG after the copyright issue is fixed. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 20:04, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, Theleekycauldron! I've tweaked the paragraph on DeChristopher's review to fix the copyright issue. ezlevtlk
ctrbs 23:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)- @Ezlev: No problem! Should be good to go! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Ezlev: No problem! Should be good to go!
- Thanks, Theleekycauldron! I've tweaked the paragraph on DeChristopher's review to fix the copyright issue. ezlevtlk