- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Ohc ¡digame! 08:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Huabeisaurus
edit- ... that due to its relative completeness, Huabeisaurus represents an important taxon for understanding sauropod evolution in Asia?
5x expanded by Reid,iain james (talk). Self nominated at 16:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC).
Major copyvio issues.Large blocks of text have been lifted verbatim from the main source. See Duplication Detector report. -Zanhe (talk) 05:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Zanhe: I would like to tell you this; The main source is a PLoS ONE article, and PLoS ONE uses a CC BY license (see here for the license). Iainstein (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your clarification. I've crossed out my copyvio comment above. It's good to know that the PLoS ONE license allows free copying. However, WP:DYK rule 2b says that "text copied verbatim from public domain sources, or which closely paraphrases such sources, is excluded ... from the x5 expansion count for x5 expanded articles." Given the prevalence of text copied from the source, I think the article is still ineligible for DYK. -Zanhe (talk) 00:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
The text that is original to Wikipedia is well under a 5x expansion. Furthermore, the article is missing an appropriate attribution template. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
