Template:Did you know nominations/Huemulite

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 21:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Huemulite

(

)

~~... that recrystallized and synthetic huemulite are easier to study than natural specimens?~~

Reviewed: Lewisia
Comment: Userspace draft moved to mainspace July 26

Created/expanded by Chris857 (talk). Self nom at 20:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

ALT1 = ... that while huemulite was discovered in 1959, it was not described until 1966?

I have scratched the original hook as I am not sure of its truth regarding synthetic material. Chris857 (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Alt1 hook length and fact good. Subscription reference taken agf no paraphrasing or other policy issues found with the online ref. Article length good. Good to go.--Kev min § 22:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)