Template:Did you know nominations/Hypericum sechmenii

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:51, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Hypericum sechmenii

(

)

~~... that despite containing druse crystals and naphthodianthrones which are thought to deter herbivory, Hypericum sechmenii is still under threat of extinction from grazing?~~ Source: "Some hypodermal cells are includes druse crystals" [sic], "agricultural works and grazing have major effect on size and abundance of populations" [sic] (Anatomical studies and conservation status of rare endemic Hypericum sechmenii Ocak&Koyuncu (Sect: Adenosepalum) from Eskişehir- Turkey,
- ALT 1: ... that despite containing crystals and chemicals which are thought to deter herbivory, Hypericum sechmenii is still under threat of extinction from grazing?

Reviewed: 10th Texas Field Battery

Improved to Good Article status by Fritzmann2002 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

The article was promoted to GA status on 14 February and nominated the next day. It has nearly 12,000 characters and is densely sourced and within policy with regard to copyvio and neutrality. QPQ is confirmed. Both hooks are within the character limit. They both contain the same facts, which are backed up by inline citations. (The part about the plants being under threat from grazing has its citation in the next sentence, but I believe this is okay since that sentence is still part of the fact.) The difference between the hooks is a slight simplification in wording, which is conducive to accessibility and pithiness. Therefore, I think ALT1 is preferable. Modussiccandi (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)