- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 10:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Ichthyovenator
![Fossil spinal column Ichthyovenator](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Ichthyovenator_vertebrae.jpg/120px-Ichthyovenator_vertebrae.jpg)
Fossil spinal column
Ichthyovenator
- ... that the spinosaurid dinosaur Ichthyovenator (fossils pictured) had two sails on its back? Source: "It is very low compared with the posterior dorsal and other sacral neural spines, and is responsible of the sinusoidal shape of the reconstructed sail of Ichthyovenator (Figs. 2and 6). Thus, the latter could be subdivided into a sacral sail including sacral vertebrae S2 to S5 and the first two caudal vertebrae, and a tall dorsal sail including at least dorsal vertebrae D12 and D13." (Allain et al. (2012):[1])
Improved to Good Article status by PaleoGeekSquared (talk). Self-nominated at 22:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
I verified the source and time of GA review. It was a very enjoyable read, thank you. Maleschreiber (talk) 01:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this. We need an inline cite for the hook fact, meaning right after the sentence in which the hook fact appears. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Added inline citation, Yoninah, and also replaced the image with a more up-to-date version. ▼PσlєοGєєкƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 21:13, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Can't say I like this new image at thumbnail size, though. Restoring tick. Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree, forgot it's much longer than the previous one. Switched it out for another image, would this work better, Yoninah? ▼PσlєοGєєкƧɊƲΔƦΣƉ▼ 06:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's pretty dark and hard to make out at thumbnail size. We can run it without an image. Yoninah (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)