Template:Did you know nominations/In His Own Write
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
In His Own Write
- * ... that critics compared John Lennon's first book, In His Own Write, to the writings of James Joyce, even though he had never read him? Source: Harris, John (2004). "Syntax Man". In Trynka, Paul (ed.). The Beatles: Ten Years that Shook the World. London: Dorling Kindersley. p. 119. ISBN 0-7566-0670-5.
- ALT1:* ... that in 1964 politician Charles Curran read a poem from John Lennon's book, In His Own Write, during a House of Commons debate? Source: Gould, Jonathan (2007). Can't Buy Me Love: The Beatles, Britain, and America. New York: Harmony Books. p. 233. ISBN 978-0-307-35337-5
5x expanded by Tkbrett (talk). Self-nominated at 18:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC).
- Brilliant article, a fun read. I learned something new about The Beatles! Expanded over 5x from sandbox. Long enough, at over 1900 characters. Neutral; impressive sources, although not able to check for close paraphrasing and other issues because most of the sources aren't accessible. (I'm AGF that they follow policies and guidelines.) All hooks are good, but the first one is best. The content is fascinating and accessible to a broad readership. QPQ not needed. Images all look good. I see that you've already submitted this article for GAN; let me know if you need any assistance. Nice job, good to go.
Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 22:32, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- Brilliant article, a fun read. I learned something new about The Beatles! Expanded over 5x from sandbox. Long enough, at over 1900 characters. Neutral; impressive sources, although not able to check for close paraphrasing and other issues because most of the sources aren't accessible. (I'm AGF that they follow policies and guidelines.) All hooks are good, but the first one is best. The content is fascinating and accessible to a broad readership. QPQ not needed. Images all look good. I see that you've already submitted this article for GAN; let me know if you need any assistance. Nice job, good to go.
