- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Integral bridge
edit- ... that integral bridges do not have movement joints? "Integral bridges can be defined as bridges without joints. They span from one abutment, over intermediate supports to the other abutment without any movement joint in the deck"
- ALT1:... that masonry arch bridges were an early form of integral bridge? "Integral bridges are not new, masonry arches being a typical early example"
- Reviewed: To follow
- Comment: I couldn't find a good image of an integral bridge abutment on Commons, I have put several sketches in the article but they are probably not that interesting.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 12:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC).
Article is new and original, is long enough and not a stub. There appears to be no copy violation. The hooks are both sourced to reliable citations and are short enough. I personally prefer the first hook.DavidCane (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Cheers DavidCane. I have added a new ref to support this (to the Irish version of BA42 which effectively replaces all references to the UK with Ireland). I have yet to do the QPQ for this nom, I will try to do one shortly - Dumelow (talk) 00:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- QPQ now done at Template:Did you know nominations/Inland free-tailed bat
- Cheers DavidCane. I have added a new ref to support this (to the Irish version of BA42 which effectively replaces all references to the UK with Ireland). I have yet to do the QPQ for this nom, I will try to do one shortly - Dumelow (talk) 00:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
