Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/International Encyclopedia of Women Composers

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

International Encyclopedia of Women Composers

edit
(
)

Created by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Prefer ALT1 hook valereee (talk) 18:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

  • The lead never needs to be referenced because it is just a summary of the article. The quotes are referenced, but just not at the direct end of the quote because they don't need to be. SL93 (talk) 18:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Why can't you find the source? It is cited right after the hook at [1]. "The 597-page, $135 compendium of biographies, composition-lists, bibliographies, publications and photographs includes more than 5,000 entries ranging over 44 centuries and nearly 70 countries." SL93 (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I can find that one. It's the 5000 I can't find in that article. valereee (talk) 19:04, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
"The 597-page, $135 compendium of biographies, composition-lists, bibliographies, publications and photographs includes more than 5,000 entries ranging over 44 centuries and nearly 70 countries." SL93 (talk) 19:05, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Still not finding "5000" or "five" in that source -- where in here source does it mention 5000? valereee (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
I already quoted it. SL93 (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
I know you quoted it. I'm saying that when I read the article it's supposed to have been sourced from, I'm not finding it in the source. valereee (talk) 19:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
The second paragraph. "The 597-page, $135 compendium of biographies, composition-lists, bibliographies, publications and photographs includes more than 5,000 entries ranging over 44 centuries and nearly 70 countries. Mr. Cohen, a 76-year-old retired town planner in Johannesburg, South Africa, spent eight years researching the book, which is meant to fill a significant gap in the history of music. The effort, he writes, was to be liberal and inclusive rather than discriminating. SL93 (talk) 19:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Oh, it was the comma lol! hahahahaha 19:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Can you recheck the adequate sourcing criterion? The lead doesn't need to be referenced and the quotes are sourced at the following references. SL93 (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Okay per hooks, I prefer alt 1. Re: lede and direct quotes being sourced -- I agree, they don't NEED to be. If it were just an article, I wouldn't question it. And I'm happy to pass it without. But I've seen (experienced) having an article pulled out of prep for that. Your call. valereee (talk) 19:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • I will keep it as it is. None of the leads in my DYK hooks have been referenced and I have been submitting DYKs for several years. SL93 (talk) 19:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Great article! valereee (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/International_Encyclopedia_of_Women_Composers&oldid=879437604"