- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:14, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Isopogon ceratophyllus
edit
Isopogon ceratophyllus
5x expanded by Casliber (talk) and Choess (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:07, 25 December 2015 (UTC).
- Comment Review under way. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:30, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
- DYK checklist template
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Passes DYK checklist.
- Review Good to go! 5X expansion (279 ==> 3471), timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. Earwig's copy violation detector: Isopogon ceratophyllus report gives it a clean bill. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. I did not have access to the book that is the source of the hook, but I WP:AGF. QPQ done, although article is not yet promoted (not required). 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Passes DYK checklist.