- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Jane Ingham
Improved to Good Article status by Gricharduk (talk) and Eewilson (talk). Nominated by Gricharduk (talk) at 10:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall: Nice work on improving this to good article status. I would prefer ALT1, as ALT0 may be only marginally interesting without further context (and personally I think it downplays Ingham's contributions). But technically both are acceptable. Epicgenius (talk) 12:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Having thought about it you make a very good point Epicgenius. I think we should lead with ALT1 for the very reasons you gave. Thank you very much for the reviewing the nomination. Gricharduk (talk) 14:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)