- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by TJMSmith (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Jane Lunnon
- ... that in January 2021 Jane Lunnon became the first woman head of Alleyn's School, Dulwich, since it was separated from the College of God's Gift in 1882?
Sources: (1) "Jane Lunnon", kesw.org
(2) J. R. Piggott, Dulwich College, a history 1616–2008 (2008), pp. 120-122- ALT1:... that Jane Lunnon won the 2020 Tatler Schools Award for "Best head of a public school", against competition from the heads of Stowe, Gresham's, Giggleswick, and Downe House?
Sources: "Tatler’s top prep and public schools announced Find out who the nominees are for this year’s Tatler Schools Awards", Tatler, 24 September 2020; "See all the winners of the Tatler Schools Awards", Tatler, 7 October 2020 - ALT2:... that Jane Lunnon, head of Wimbledon High School, said of Love Island that it was "not really doing anything very much for feminism"?
Sources: Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "Headteacher Jane Lunnon: Love Island ‘not doing much for feminism’", channel4.com
- ALT1:... that Jane Lunnon won the 2020 Tatler Schools Award for "Best head of a public school", against competition from the heads of Stowe, Gresham's, Giggleswick, and Downe House?
- Reviewed: E. Victor Toeg
Created by Moonraker (talk). Self-nominated at 12:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC).
- Long enough, nominated in time, QPQ done. Appears neutral/stable. Generally adequate inline sources, which appear reliable enough (but see below caveats/queries). Earwig found no copyright problems and spotchecks on freely available sources revealed no close paraphrasing. Hooks are concise, not negative and check out with sources. Alt 1 is fine.
- I find the main hook a little dull, having not previously heard of Alleyn's School (and I'm a Brit, it's probably less known internationally); this needs more context to be usable, I think.
- I like Alt 2 but the quotation given is slightly inaccurate, I think what she actually says is: "is not really doing anything very much for feminism". What you've put in the article is technically correct (C4 misquotes her) but the hook is not. I also think it needs the context of her being a head teacher adding. It would also be useful to add more about this interview clip to the article; she talks extensively about the show's emphasis on appearance, particularly sexualised appearance.
- Not seeing a source for the place & year of birth?
- Does Lunnon publish her middle name, maiden name and marriage date? If not, I think these should probably be removed per BLP policy if they are only sourced to the marriage certificate. Neither she nor her husband are public figures and the marriage certificate is not a published source.
- kesw.org & rolemodels.me ref details could do with expansion. Channel 4 interview needs the date. Espresso Addict (talk) 04:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, Espresso Addict. I think you are right, I am adding more context to the main hook, and I have corrected and expanded Alt2 as suggested. On the middle name, the answer is yes, Lunnon has included it in several public documents. I wasn’t aware of the BLP policy, which strikes me as very unhelpful to the purpose of an encyclopaedia. I doubt if any other reference works are so particular. In England and Wales Registration of Births, Deaths, and Marriages, is a public process, and while the original documents are primary sources, the indexes to them are publicly available secondary sources and in no sense private or confidential. So I would be inclined to leave those dates (but not to complain if someone comes along and removes them). The source for the place and year of birth is in the next citation. I’ll get around to expanding the article on the lines you have put forward. Moonraker (talk) 05:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Espresso Addict: is this good to go now? jp×g 22:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- EA hasn't been active in several days so a new reviewer may be needed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- A review is still needed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)