- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:07, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jayne Spain
Spain in 1971
- ... that Mrs. Spain (pictured) was from California?
ALT1:... that Jayne Spain (pictured) hired one handicapped individual for every 10 able bodies? Company President Is Liberated WomanALT2:... that Jayne Spain (pictured) was appointed by President Richard Nixon to vice-chairwoman of the President's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped due to her activism? She Practices What She Preaches
Created by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC).
@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Article is well cited and I will be assuming that there should be no copyvio issues. I find ALT0 interesting. I find ALT1 just as interesting as ALT0, however the term "able bodies" can be considered derogatory. See this article, "Terms to Avoid When Writing About Disability". Is there a better term that can be used both in the hook and the article? Let me know and please notify me with a ping. ALT2 is just a matter-of-fact, so it's not interesting. QPQ is also missing. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 13:54, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- I suggest maybe using
"ALT1a:... that Jayne Spain (pictured) hired one handicapped individual for every ten individuals without a disability?"or "ALT1b:... that Jayne Spain (pictured) hired one handicapped individual for everytennine non-disabled individuals?" per this style guide. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 14:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC); Edited 02:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nice4What, thank you for the quick review. I apologize about the language, wasn't thinking. I agree your proposed hook is much better. I am working on my QPQ. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:23, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nice4What, QPQ completed. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- @HickoryOughtShirt?4:
Quickly passed and good to go.You still need to replace the derogatory term from the article. The source also states that she hired one in ten, not a ratio of one to ten. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 01:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Changed to non-disabled individuals. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nice4What, Oops, must've misread that. Fixed. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Nice4What, is what I fixed ok? HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:10, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Since you changed the phrasing in the article, you may need to make it more clear in a DYK hook to match. Other than that, should be good to go. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 02:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)- Maybe "ALT1c:... that Jayne Spain (pictured) hired a ratio of one physically handicapped individual in every ten employees?" per the newspaper sourced. Thoughts? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 02:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's good. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- @HickoryOughtShirt?4:
- I suggest maybe using
