- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 00:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Jessica Bibby, Natalie Porter
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that current Canberra Capitals players Jessica Bibby and Natalie Porter were both 2000 WNBA draft picks?
- Reviewed: Scipione Piattoli
- Comment: Bibby is a 5 expansion, with expansion drafted in user space. Porter was moved from user space.
Created/expanded by LauraHale (talk), Hawkeye7 (talk). Nominated by LauraHale (talk) at 03:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
since nominating two articles here, two should be reviewed rather than one.
Bibby page is expanded and long enough; and hook is cited and reference confirms cite. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:49, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- Unless the rules have changed, one review per nomination, regardless of the number of articles nominated, is sufficient. Schwede66 16:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Was not an issue for any of my other double hooks. If it was necessary, I have four other articles I have reviewed but not used yet so I could tack it on. --LauraHale (talk) 20:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will continue the next checks. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Porter is new enough, big enough, neutral enough, cited enough, no plagiarism, hook is in article cited and in the reference.
Bibby is neutral, cited, plagiarism free. Good to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)- Porter is good to go, too. By the way, both articles have photos that, if cropped, would be suitable to go with the hook. Schwede66 21:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
