- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jessica Pierce
edit- ... that the philosopher Jessica Pierce argues that some animals may have a sense of morality?
- Reviewed/Reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/KamAZ "Shuttle". Josh Milburn (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Created as part of the 2016 Women in Philosophy Drive. Feel free to join us! Josh Milburn (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Created by J Milburn (talk). Self-nominated at 16:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC).
• 
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 16:18, 03 September 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 4483 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- Note that this is a biographical article about a living person. All claims must be cited to a reliable source.
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 32.9% confidence. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• 
Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 86 characters
- ✗ J Milburn has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 18:59, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Length & date ok. Article appears neutral and is adequately cited; though much of it is cited to sources connected to the subject I did not spot any BLP concerns. No copyright or paraphrasing issues detected. I'd personally streamline the lead somehat but that's not a DYK concern, and the article would be long enough to qualify even with some trimming. Hook is interesting, concise, not negative, and cited to multiple book reviews; those that I could access confirmed the hook fact. QPQ now completed. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
