- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Joe Davis
- ... that Joe Davis, the champion from 1927 to 1946, remains the only unbeaten player at the World Snooker Championship? Source: John Nauright; Sarah Zipp (3 January 2020). Routledge Handbook of Global Sport. Taylor & Francis. p. 277: "winning the first fifteen championships between 1927 and 1946 ... he remains the only undefeated player at the Professional Championships"
- ALT1:
... that Joe Davis made the first officially recognised snooker maximum break of 147 in 1955?Source: "First official 147 break in snooker". guinnessworldrecords.com:"Joe Davis (UK) was the first snooker player to achieve an officially ratified maximum break in snooker ... on 22 January 1955."
- ALT1:
- Reviewed: Justin Wilson (racing driver)
Improved to Good Article status by BennyOnTheLoose (talk). Self-nominated at 11:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC).
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Recently elevated to GA status so it passes newness, there aren't any unsourced sentences, and I see no plagiarism, neutrality, or grammatical problems. I approve ALT0 as being the only unbeaten person is more interesting. Jon698 talk 14:44 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but I don't see an inline cite for the hook fact in the article. Yoninah (talk) 20:59, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Yoninah thanks for looking at this. I have made a small addition to the article, adding the 1927 to 1946 period into the same sentence as the unbeaten statement, but I'm not sure if that addresses your concern. I am, of course, happy to make any further changes as necessary. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- @BennyOnTheLoose: yes, that does the trick, thanks. Do you want to use the more encyclopedic "undefeated" instead of "unbeaten"? Yoninah (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: - yes, "undefeated" is better, thank you. I've made the change in the article. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
