- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 10:42, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Joshua George Beard
Joshua George Beard
5x expanded by Z1720 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Looks good to go! Ploni (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Came here to promote; not convinced by the image licence/clarity. According to Commons, it is dated 1914, and I'm pretty sure we didn't had {{cc-by-2.5}} in 1914. I think the licencing should be a combination of {{PD-Canada}} and {{PD-US-expired}}. That being said, is the image clear at 100px? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kavyansh.Singh: I have added the two templates to the Commons licencing. As for if the image is clear at 100px: that's a judgement call for reviewers/promoters and I am alright with this hook running without the image if editors make that determination. Z1720 (talk) 16:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks good to go! Ploni (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2022 (UTC)