- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
K/DA
edit- ... that a virtual K-pop group composed of video game characters once topped Billboard's World Digital Song Sales chart in 2018? Source: here (Source #16 in article)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alisa Takigawa
- Comment: A interesting article with an interesting hook I reckon. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 12:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Created by Satellizer (talk). Self-nominated at 12:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. Hook is very interesting and verified with provided reference. QPQ is done. There are, however, some issues with close paraphrasing. Also Earwig's alarmingly high copyvio risk is mostly due to quotations, there are some unquoted phrases that are quite close to the sources. Please see Earwig report . -Zanhe (talk) 22:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Zanhe: is close paraphrasing here the only issue or are the quotations also excessive? I assume the course of action now is to reword the offending phrases as per Earwig's report (where possible) - do I need to also cut down on quotations? Thanks, Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 06:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'd personally prefer fewer quotations, but that's not a DYK requirement. For the purpose of DYK, you only need to reword the offending sentences. -Zanhe (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Zanhe: I've rephrased the sentences with close paraphrasing issues and reduced the article's dependency on quotes - it should be okay now Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 11:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the issues. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- No worries - thanks for the swift response! Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 00:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Zanhe: I've rephrased the sentences with close paraphrasing issues and reduced the article's dependency on quotes - it should be okay now Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 11:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'd personally prefer fewer quotations, but that's not a DYK requirement. For the purpose of DYK, you only need to reword the offending sentences. -Zanhe (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Zanhe: is close paraphrasing here the only issue or are the quotations also excessive? I assume the course of action now is to reword the offending phrases as per Earwig's report (where possible) - do I need to also cut down on quotations? Thanks, Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 06:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
