- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kaluga Queen
edit... that after CITES greatly curtailed the production of wild caviar in 2008 from the Caspian Sea, Chinese caviar brand Kaluga Queen emerged as the world's largest caviar supplier?
Created by Muzzleflash (talk). Self-nominated at 22:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC).
- Just want to note that I have review Jinping Mountains. Muzzleflash (talk) 22:59, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Long enough and new enough, well referenced (almost each sentence). No close paraphrasing detected or suspected and neutrally written. QPQ review done. The hook seems acceptable, within length and sourced. It's on the long side and I don't find it that interesting. I propose ALT1 as more more "hooky" and tying the hook to one of the more interesting parts of the article - the international acceptance:
- ALT1:... that 21 of the 26 3-starred Michelin restaurants in Paris serve Kaluga Queen caviar?
Muzzleflash, please comment on ALT1. MB 01:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that your suggestion for a hook is more engaging. Muzzleflash (talk) 05:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Approving ALT1. I've changed the piped link (Chinese caviar -> Kaluga Queen caviar) to make it clear that 21 of 26 use one brand of caviar, not various brands from China. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- I agree that your suggestion for a hook is more engaging. Muzzleflash (talk) 05:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
