The following is an archived discussion of Karl Paryla's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 01:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Karl Paryla
edit- ... that American political pressure prevented Austrian communist actor and director Karl Paryla from performing in the 1952 Salzburg Festival?
Created by Drmies (talk). Self nominated at 17:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC).
Doing... --Tito Dutta (contact) 23:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
The review is being done. The issues/concerns will be listed below. It is requested to notify the reviewer (using {{Talkback}} or {{Whisperback}}) after addressing the issues.
- Notes
- Article created or expanded on: 8 April
- Prose portion has 1500+ characters: Yes
- Hook less than 200 characters: Yes
- Issues
- I have downloaded the JSTOR article of ref 5 which I think, supports the hook. Currently page 221 to 230 have been referred! Could you please mention the exact page number(s)?
- Not directly a DYK issue, but, please tag the talk page! --Tito Dutta (contact) 00:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Titodutta. Thanks for the review. I added my QPQ review above. As for your other comments, I'll see what I can do about the talk page. Now, as for the article, the formatting (and the citation template) don't allow for the page number of the reference--but the evidence is on p. 225, note 23: "Paryla had taken part each year in the Salzburg Festival and was only prevented from doing so again in 1952 by heavy American pressure." Thank you, Drmies (talk) 00:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
- {{rp}} can be used! The citation looks fine! --Tito Dutta (contact) 11:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
It's unclear to me where this nomination stands. Is it ready to be ticked, or are there additional concerns that have to be addressed?—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 17:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Though neither the original nominator nor the reviewer have checked back, upon further inspection is has become clear to me that not all the conerns of the reviewer have been settled. That being the case, I give the nominator a few more days to fix this. Otherwise, this nomination will be withdrawn. —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 14:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, there was no need for me to check back since there do not seem to be any problems. The RP template can be used but it's not mandatory, as I'm sure you know. In other words, Tito Dutta should have put an OK tick on this and sent it on. Drmies (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Good to go! --Tito Dutta (contact) 23:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
