- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:42, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Keldholme Priory election dispute
edit
- ... that in early 14th-century Yorkshire, a disputed Priory election led to nuns being placed under interdict and later being accused of being "daughters of perdition" by their own Archbishop? Source: For the disputed election generally, Power, E. (1964), Medieval English Nunneries, C. 1275 to 1535 (repr. ed.) New York: Biblo & Tannen Publishers, p.52; for the interdict, Heale, M. (2008), '"Not a Thing for a Stranger to Enter Upon". The Selection of Monastic Superiors in Late Medieval and Tudor England', In Burton, J. E., & Stober, K., Monasteries and Society in the British Isles in the Later Middle Ages, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, p.58; for the perdition, ibid Power.
Created by Serial Number 54129 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Serial Number 54129: Looks good, however there is a very fair copyvio percentage overlap. Since it is greater than 50%, I am hesitant to promote the hook. If you can reword phrases within the article to reduce this number, it should be good to go. Ergo Sum 23:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC) Ergo Sum 23:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ergo Sum: There is clearly no copyvio: are you using the automated tool? I think it's probably highlighting sourced quotations and/or proper nouns. Let me check.Yes, yes it is. Cheers! ——SerialNumber54129 23:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: Yes, I am, but I've also checked it manually. You're correct that most of the highlights come from direct quotations, so it's not much of a copyright issue. However, I see the articles uses vastly more quotes than any other article I've seen on wikipedia, most unnecessary. It is preferable to state in paraphrase rather than in quotation that which needn't be quoted. Ergo Sum 00:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@Serial Number 54129: Looks good, however there is a very fair copyvio percentage overlap. Since it is greater than 50%, I am hesitant to promote the hook. If you can reword phrases within the article to reduce this number, it should be good to go. Ergo Sum 23:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC) Ergo Sum 23:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)