- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kendra Sunderland
- Reviewed: U.S. v. McMahon
- Comment: I omitted what the award is for because I’m not sure people should see “tits” on the front page.
Created by Trillfendi (talk). Self-nominated at 00:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is all good. But misses on timelines. Like it does not mention that she won the award in 2018. Also, there is no censorship required in the article (censorship may be required on main page). Hence you can freely mention the tits in the article but maybe skip from the hook. In fact, you can rephrase Alt1 in such an intriguing manner that people will want to click and read full article to know for what she won the award. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
- I assumed that putting the inaurugal event that it would be redundant to include the year, but if you want me to I’ll add it. Trillfendi (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Not everyone keeps chronology of award in their mind to know when the inaugural award was present. Alt1 is good to go. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- I had the assumption that the reader would go to the hyperlinked article. Trillfendi (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Returned from queue per talk —valereee (talk) 01:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I was waiting for everyone else to come back around after the Did you Know talk page archived it. Trillfendi (talk) 03:42, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Okay. Can you please propose a new hook then? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 04:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Trillfendi: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Is the original hook via Daily News unsuitable? Trillfendi (talk) 00:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
- Personally I think it's okay. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Original hook is also verified and ready to go. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Article is all good. But misses on timelines. Like it does not mention that she won the award in 2018. Also, there is no censorship required in the article (censorship may be required on main page). Hence you can freely mention the tits in the article but maybe skip from the hook. In fact, you can rephrase Alt1 in such an intriguing manner that people will want to click and read full article to know for what she won the award. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
