Template:Did you know nominations/Kinsella v. Krueger
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 12:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kinsella v. Krueger
edit- ... that in Kinsella v. Krueger the Supreme Court of the United States freed a woman who had fatally stabbed her husband?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sinclair C5, Template:Did you know nominations/Tami Bond
- Comment: New article, moved to mainspace over redirect
Moved to mainspace by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC).
- Moved from sandbox on 26 April, 8471 characters of prose, neutral, reliable sources, conforms to policy, hook okay and cited from an online source, good to go.--Ykraps (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but would like to know if the www.arlingtoncemetery.net site is public domain, because there seems to be close paraphrasing between that source and the article, especially in the description of the murder (see [1]). Yoninah (talk) 22:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is not public domain. I have looked over it carefully, and believe that there is no close paraphrase. The high score is due to a number of names and positions, some technical terms, and two block quotes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- I did check for paraphrasing but saw nothing untoward, just the quotations as noted by Hawkeye7, and a lot of titles and proper nouns. Didn't use that tool though, might give it a go next time.--Ykraps (talk) 15:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
