- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Laura Tàunâjik
- ... that with as many as a quarter of mothers in eastern Greenland experiencing domestic violence, Laura Tàunâjik proposed a women's shelter in Tasiilaq? Source: [1]; there's a Danish version here with the same information and more easily translated - "Derudover anfører Laura Tàunâjik, at det i en undersøgelse fra 2008 bliver anslået, at op mod hver fjerde mor i Østgrønland bliver udsat for fysisk mishandling. Det er dobbelt så mange som i Nuuk.", in English as "In addition, Laura Tàunâjik states that in a study from 2008 it is estimated that up to every fourth mother in East Greenland is exposed to physical abuse. That is twice as many as in Nuuk."
- ALT1: ... that when Laura Tàunâjik resigned from Greenland's parliament to care for her children, she kept her position as a municipal councilmember? Source: [2] "Laura Táunâjik Uitsatikitseq er medlem af kommunalbestyrelsen i Kommuneqarfik Sermersooq. Det er en post, hun stadig vil beholde, skriver hun.", in English as "Laura Táunâjik Uitsatikitseq is a member of the council of Sermersooq municipality. It is a post she still wants to keep, she writes."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Global Methodist Church
- Comment: other hooks welcome - unsure how broad these appeal, but ALT0 and ALT1 have interesting elements (extent of DV, a mother caring for children over political ambition)
Created by Urve (talk). Self-nominated at 16:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC).
Original hook seems interesting enough to me, but I agree they both have interesting elements. Detail, length, newness, sources and NPOV in the article are all good too. No copyvio detected. (P.S. I'm new to reviewing, so feedback is welcome) —AFreshStart (talk) 01:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
