Template:Did you know nominations/Lawyers for Liberty

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Lawyers for Liberty, Hamza Kashgari

edit
  • ALT1:... that the Malaysian Lawyers for Liberty are trying to save Hamza Kashgari from being executed in Saudi Arabia for three allegedly blasphemous tweets?
  • Reviewed: Paul Davidson (producer)
  • Comment: Creator of article Lawyers for Liberty: User:Boud; creator of article Hamza Kashgari: User:OsamaK. I tend to think that ALT1 would raise more curiosity in the reader than the main hook, even though it's longer - lawyers in one mostly Muslim country acting for someone in another is probably more unexpected to the average reader than what would seem to be the case in the main hook (since the info that Kashgari is a Saudi and risks execution in Saudi Arabia, not in Malaysia, is missing in that hook).

Created/expanded by Boud (talk), OsamaK (talk). Nominated by Boud (talk) at 02:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

New enough, long enough and neutral. All facts cited, but didn't check for copyvio. ALT1 is better and clearer imo. Bahraini Activist Talk to me 10:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)