Template:Did you know nominations/Legitimate expectation
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Legitimate expectation
edit- ... that a 1999 UK case held that a disabled woman told by a health authority she would have a "home for life" in a facility had a substantive legitimate expectation the authority would not shut it down?
- Reviewed: Maitreyi and Niari Valley.
- Comment: This hook contains two nominated articles. "Legitimate expectation" was expanded from a version in a sandbox on 12 May 2015. The hook is referenced by footnotes 7, 63 and 64. "R. v. North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan" was expanded from a version in a sandbox on 16 May 2015 (the original version is here).
5x expanded by Leongjiayin (talk), Markkvincent (talk), Pufang (talk), Amos.tan.2011 (talk), Brendan.tan.2011 (talk), PrisCWQ (talk), and Yixin.tan.2011 (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 15:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC).
These two articles, one an expansion and the other new, are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are well referenced and the articles are neutral. Due to the nature of the sources, I was unable to assess whether there were any policy issues involved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
