Template:Did you know nominations/List of currencies in South America

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

List of currencies in South America

(

)

~~... that in 15 different countries in South America, there are 14 different currencies?~~

Reviewed: Embun

Moved to mainspace by Matty.007 (talk). Self nominated at 19:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC).

Anyhow, Falklands and (in particular) the South Georgia islands are usually not considered countries of their own. A better ALT1 would be ~~... that all sovereign states of South America have their own national currencies, except Ecuador?~~ --Soman (talk) 10:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Changed wording of alt slightly, but Alt 2: ... that all countries in South America use their own currency, except Ecuador? Mat ty.007 10:59, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

size and age check out - no too-close paraphrasing in refs 2 or 4. Segment on Brazil's economy could be clearer as last bit of it a bit hard to follow. Can we do better than a contiki ref for Ecuador's currency? Though I concede it works by virtue of c. sixteen refs citing all currencies I guess....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't think I can find a ref (it was so long ago I can't remember what I googled), I try and add the most reliable source so that was the only one which I could find explicitly stating the fact. However, as you say the fact that the other currencies all have references... I'm not too sure if it's OK, if it's not I can use a different hook. Thanks, Mat ty.007 10:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the copy edit, as well! Mat ty.007 10:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

for Alt2. Date and length check out. I agree that Contiki isn't the best ref, but the claim is by no means controversial and in fact the list itself is referenced and as such backs up the claim. --Soman (talk) 21:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much to you both for the review. I have struck the hooks not needed. Thanks, Mat ty.007 16:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)