Template:Did you know nominations/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Brabourne Stadium
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at Brabourne Stadium
edit- ... that bowlers have taken thirteen five-wicket hauls in tests and one five-wicket haul in One Day International cricket matches played at Brabourne Stadium in Mumbai?
- Reviewed: 2011–12 Logan Cup
Created/expanded by AroundTheGlobe (talk). Self nom at 14:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- comment the article is quite poor. It consists of the main data in only a table and prose is only lead, some of which doesnt een belong on this page 9the whole first para is more suited to the stadium page nd the first 2 sentences of the second pra are just explanations of the term means. That leaves about half as relevant prose which is not long enough.Lihaas (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- The first para gives an intro to the venue, like most of the ground-century FL's and the second para explains fivers etc, just how the centuries are explained. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 10:44, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- comment the article is quite poor. It consists of the main data in only a table and prose is only lead, some of which doesnt een belong on this page 9the whole first para is more suited to the stadium page nd the first 2 sentences of the second pra are just explanations of the term means. That leaves about half as relevant prose which is not long enough.Lihaas (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Hook is referenced appropriately inline. The length and date of creation both check out fine. There is possibly a little too much trivia about the ground, but even once that is taken out of consideration, then article is long enough. Spotchecks reveal no evidence of copyvio or close paraphrasing. Disclaimer: the nominator, AroundTheGlobe carried out their QPQ review on my article. I have carried out the review as I would any other, but there may be some who feel it is a conflict of interest, in which case, I will understand if my review is disregarded. Harrias talk 11:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)