Template:Did you know nominations/Lonesome Glory

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 04:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Lonesome Glory

edit
  • Comment: Not a self-nom. --PFHLai (talk) 00:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Created/expanded by Tigerboy1966 (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 00:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)



Tigerboy1966 has 5+ DYKs. This appears to be an abuse of process to nominate without the required QPQs. This review will go forward when some one does a QPQ. This isn't a case of helping a new user who would otherwise not get an article. This is PFHLai consistently nominating Tigerboy1966's article and Tigerboy1966 consistently taking credit. PFHLai's time would be better spent doing QPQs than other areas of DYK given the backlog and willing hands to deal with other issues. --LauraHale (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

  • LauraHale, I think you may want to scroll up and down T:TDYK and look carefully what I do here. --PFHLai (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
  • The article is new enough and long enough, but needs a source for the last three sentences of the Racing career section. The hook is properly formatted and interesting. Once the sourcing is addressed, this should be good to go. Dana boomer (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Tigerboy1966 has put in a couple of footnotes there. Better now? --PFHLai (talk) 21:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes, looks good to go now. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 02:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Dana. --PFHLai (talk) 02:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)