Template:Did you know nominations/Lorelei Fountain

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Lorelei Fountain

edit

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self nominated at 17:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough, long enough, and very interesting. There are no indications of copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. There is inline sourcing throughout. The hook is interesting, not too long and sourced. The only outstanding issue is QPQ. Once that is finished, it will be good to go. --I am One of Many (talk) 08:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • @I am One of Many: Thanks. I may not be able to finish the QPQ until tomorrow, though, but I will work on that ASAP. Epicgenius (talk) 10:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I've reviewed an article. Epicgenius (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Article is now reviewed, so it is good to go.
  • The last two paragraphs under Origins lack any cites, per Rule D2. And the hook could be written a little sharper. Yoninah (talk) 10:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you, that's better. All paragraphs cited. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)