Template:Did you know nominations/Loser.com

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Loser.com

edit

Created by Feminist (talk). Self-nominated at 11:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Review Earwig is clear. No copy vios or close paraphrasing problems. New article. Long enough. QPQ confirmed. Every paragraph is cited. Hook is distinctly neutral, given the subjects and some of their responses. There might be sexier hooks, but this one works. And this one is supported by multiple on line reliable sources. 7&6=thirteen () 11:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  • @Feminist: This article needs attention to the referencing of its final paragraph before it can be promoted. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: modified. Note that I did not write that paragraph. feminist 05:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I think the paragraph needs a direct citation to source 9 rather than a cited footnote. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Done. feminist 13:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
FWIW, I wrote the paragraph. And there was nothing stopping @Cwmhiraeth: from adding the needed citation. In any event, it's resolved now. 7&6=thirteen () 14:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Well, I was in the middle of building a prep set at the time, and if I promote this, as I was planning to do, I thought it best to do things by the book in case this controversial article causes any trouble at the DYK discussion page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:38, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
No harm; no foul; no worries. 7&6=thirteen () 17:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)