- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Ludian County
edit- ... that Ludian was a courier station on the Ancient tea route?
5x expanded by Huangjinghai (talk). Self nominated at 03:14, 11 August 2014 (UTC).
- The article is certainly long enough and new enough, but I have a question, Huangjinghai: where is the source for your hook? While it's mentioned in the paragraph, I'm not sure if the hook is supported by the source you mentioned at the end of its paragraph. If it's there, please affirm if that's the case. Thanks. :) --Sky Harbor (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it is supported by ref 20, in the pages 3–4 of that book is a brief introduction of transportation throughout history till year 2007. And I found an English site:Tea-Horse Trade Route Linking Tibet With the Hinterland, which mentioned Ludian ("The Yunnan-Tibet Route ... from Shigu in Lijiang to Ludian..."). But Ludian is a small county, I'm sorry that I can not find enough English sources to support this article.--Huangjinghai (talk) 03:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- That's not a problem at all: I'll assume good faith on your source, so I'll pass this. Ready for publication. --Sky Harbor (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, it is supported by ref 20, in the pages 3–4 of that book is a brief introduction of transportation throughout history till year 2007. And I found an English site:Tea-Horse Trade Route Linking Tibet With the Hinterland, which mentioned Ludian ("The Yunnan-Tibet Route ... from Shigu in Lijiang to Ludian..."). But Ludian is a small county, I'm sorry that I can not find enough English sources to support this article.--Huangjinghai (talk) 03:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- The article is certainly long enough and new enough, but I have a question, Huangjinghai: where is the source for your hook? While it's mentioned in the paragraph, I'm not sure if the hook is supported by the source you mentioned at the end of its paragraph. If it's there, please affirm if that's the case. Thanks. :) --Sky Harbor (talk) 01:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)