Template:Did you know nominations/Ludwigsburg porcelain
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ludwigsburg porcelain
edit.jpg)
Dancers, c. 1763
- ... that some Ludwigsburg porcelain figures from the 1760s (example pictured) show the lighter dance costumes pioneered by the ballet master Jean-Georges Noverre? The Jack and Belle Linsky Collection in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1984, Metropolitan Museum of Art, ISBN 0870993704, 9780870993701, fully online, page 290, #295
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk) and Vami IV (talk). Nominated by Johnbod (talk) at 02:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC).
Substantial expansion, on multiple sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I changed the pictured-clause to more standard. The image is licensed and a good illustration. - A few questions, suggestions more than needed for an approval:
- prose: some sentences have an abundance of commas (for my taste), example "After an artistically, but not financially, successful first two decades, the factory ..." - I think "an" doesn't match "decades", and it is difficult reading, taking too long until we reach "decades".
- images: I am no friend of text squeezed between images, - less might be more.
- I don't need the description of the logo when it is also shown - but much later.
- article name: I see that there are many more links to the Manufactory than to "porcelain", - move article or change links?
- How should we understand that lead and article say production stopped in 2010, and the article also says that production "halted" in 2016?
- Food for thought? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- No, really this should go on the talk page not here. Taking your points:
- that one reworded
- that was Vami - changed back
- well you do really
- It's just been moved to reflect reliable sources, and place the emphasis on the wares not the company. I've updated Template:Porcelain, which accounts for the great majority of them [in fact all of them it seems]. The other links will catch up in time.
- 2016 was added by Vami. A certain contradiction: I'm pretty sure no porcelain was being made in 2016 so I've removed that.
Johnbod (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thank you for explaining and fixing my mistake. The template change helps a lot, thanks for fixing that especially. Excuse my lazyness (not to go to the talk page, - also I think that's for all, while these were questions just for you authors), I am a bit tired after having to deal with another RD for hours. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- I may have misread the source I used for 2016, because I almost made a grave error in the same section, also working from a German-language source or two. –Vami_IV† 17:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
