- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 22:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Lunar Ejecta and Meteorites (experiment)
Created by Seddon (talk). Self-nominated at 15:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lunar Ejecta and Meteorites (experiment); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Draft was moved to article space yesterday. It has a readable prose size of 3453 characters. Each paragraph has a reference. WP:EARWIG shows no copyright violations. The hook is interesting. No QPQ was performed so far. Please ping me once it is performed or if none is needed because you have less than 5 nominations. As a sidenote: I would suggest adding a date to the lead to let readers know when the experiment started. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Phlsph7: I've pulled a QPQ to from another DYK that's yet to be reviewed and will do a new one for the other nom. Seddon talk 16:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- approve, looks good. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Phlsph7 and Seddon: I made a few edits to add projects to the talk page and categories to the article. I would like to change a word in the hook from "kept" to "continuously" without objection. Also we should consider putting the year or years WP:DYKCOMPLETE in the lead and body of the article. Also we should link Apollo 17 in our article and it should appear in the lead.
- Alt1 also works fine. I agree that having the date and the relation to Apollo 17 in the lead would be better. Phlsph7 (talk) 16:39, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: works for me! 23:54, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Draft was moved to article space yesterday. It has a readable prose size of 3453 characters. Each paragraph has a reference. WP:EARWIG shows no copyright violations. The hook is interesting. No QPQ was performed so far. Please ping me once it is performed or if none is needed because you have less than 5 nominations. As a sidenote: I would suggest adding a date to the lead to let readers know when the experiment started. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)